The above captioned case was scheduled for hearing on February 5, 2002 at l:00  p.m.  At that time, Chairman Farrell and Commissioners Wahlberg, Newbrook, Pearson, Coutu, O’Connell, Filippi and Burlingame were present.  The fire service was represented by Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal Charles Lawrence of the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Newbrook and seconded by Commissioner Wahlberg to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.

FINDING OF FACT

The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of an April l0, 2000 plan review report compiled by the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office during the February 5, 2002 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby adopts the April l0, 2000 plan review report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Board’s findings such as correction of a deficiency shall be noted herein.

	Any deficiency, understood by the Board, to have been corrected which is not so corrected shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved as used 
herein is defined in Section 23-28.l-4(3) of the Rhode Island General Laws.

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS

1.	It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiencies #l and 2, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office.

2.	See item #l above.

3.	The Board hereby grants a variance from the provisions of Section 23-28.7-7 in order to allow the Applicant to provide the boiler room with an additional set of louvers and sprinkler heads and heat detectors over the boiler, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office.

4.	The Board hereby grants a variance from the provisions of Section 23-28.l7-2 in order to allow the Applicant to maintain the existing remoteness of the cited two (2) exits from the second floor of this facility.  In granting this variance, the Board directs the Applicant to separate the cited two (2) exits with an approved rated door, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshal’s Office.

5.	It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiencies #5,6 and 7, to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshal.

6-7. See item #5 above.

8.	The Board hereby grants a variance from the provisions of Section 23-28.l7-6 in order to allow the Applicant to maintain the existing rating and enclosure of the cited central stairway and passageway.

9.	It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiencies #9,10 and 11, to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshal.

10-11.  See item #9 above.

This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicant’s timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.

Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Board’s Decision, shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such changes creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.l-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.

	The Applicant may appeal the Board’s Decision within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision.  [RIGL 42-35-l5(c)]