The above-captioned case was scheduled for hearing on November 15, 2011 at 1:00 P.M.  At that time, Chairman Newbrook, Vice Chairperson Filippi and Commissioners Richard, Burlingame, Blackburn, Jasparro, Jackson and Walker were present.  The fire service was represented by Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals Richard Vespia and Timothy Lutz of the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Walker and seconded by Commissioners Blackburn, Jasparro and Richard to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.

FINDINGS OF FACT
	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of a March 15, 2010 inspection report compiled by the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Providence Fire Marshals Office during the November 15, 2011 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the March 15, 2010 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein. 

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the State Fire Marshal or his or her designee.

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS 
	1.  During the November 15, 2011 hearing on this matter, the Board was advised by the Applicant that the subject facility may possibly be sold in the future.  The Board was further advised by the Providence Fire Marshals Office that, at a minimum, the facility should be protected by smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.  Accordingly, the Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of thirty (30) days from the date of this decision in which to have the Applicant install approved battery smoke and CO detection within this facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshals Office and to further provide the Providence Fire Marshals Office with a plan of action for the correction of deficiency 1.  The Board notes that the above thirty-day time frame may be extended by the Providence Fire Marshals Office for good faith efforts being shown by the Applicant.  The Board further grants the Applicant an additional 150 days in order to implement the above plan of action for the correction of deficiency 1 at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  Again, the Providence Fire Marshals Office is hereby authorized to extend the above 150 day deadline for good faith efforts being shown by the Applicant.
	2.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant the time relief as outlined in item 1 above in order to correct deficiency 2 by providing hard wired or radio wireless smoke and carbon monoxide detectors in this facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  Again, the Board notes that the Providence Fire Marshals Office may extend either or both of the above timelines for good faith efforts being shown by the Applicant.  Finally, the Board notes that as a temporary measure, the Applicant shall provide this facility with approved battery-powered smoke and carbon monoxide detection within thirty (30) days as outlined above.
	3.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant the time variance outlined in item 1 above in order to correct deficiency 3 by providing this facility with approved portable fire extinguishers, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshals Office.
	4.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant the time variance outlined in item 1 above in order to correct deficiency 4 by providing the cited apartment doors with approved spring-loaded hinges, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Providence Fire Marshals Office.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS
	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).  
Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].