As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on November 25, 2014 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, pursuant to RI General Laws Section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook and Commissioners Booth, Jackson, Pearson, Richard and Thornton.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal Chris Mahoney of the Newport Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Walter Chase.
TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under Chapter 23-28.3, entitled the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Walter Chase (Senior Warden) of Church of St. John the Evangelist, 61 Poplar Street, Newport, RI dated September 3, 2014.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  140108 opened on September 10, 2014.
4.	The matter was previously before the Board on September 30, 2014 at which time Decision  140108 was issued denying the Applicants request for relief and directing that the building be brought into compliance on or before December 31, 2014.  At that time the Board advised the Applicant that if there were practical difficulties in meeting this deadline that they could return for further review and a possible time extension.
5.	A subsequent hearing on the Application was conducted on November 25, 2014 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
6.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Thornton and seconded by Commissioner Richard to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  140108 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  140108 dated September 3, 2014 and filed on September 10, 2014.
2.	Newport Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated November 11, 2013.
3.	Decision  140108 dated October 8, 2014.
4.	Letter to the Board from Walter Chase of St. John the Evangelist dated October 31, 2014.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the November 25, 2014 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The Decision below corresponds with the prior Decision  140108 heard on September 30, 2014 and issued October 8, 2014.  The above Decision was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Newport Fire Marshals Office during the November 25, 2014 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the October 8, 2014 Decision as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

1.	The Board grants the Applicant a time variance of one (1) year from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 13.1.8.1(1) for the installation of an approved fire alarm system throughout the facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Newport Fire Marshals Office.
2.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant the time variance outlined in item 1 above to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 13.1.8.1(3) by providing this facility with approved emergency lighting, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Newport Fire Marshals Office.
3.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant the time variance outlined in item 1 above to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 13.1.8.1(11) by protecting the furnaces/boiler in this facility with approved domestically-supplied sprinkler heads, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Newport Fire Marshals Office.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See:  Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
4.	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].