The above-captioned case was scheduled for hearing on August 15, 2000 at 1:30 P.M. At that time, Chairman Farrell and Commissioners Pearson, Wahlberg, O'Connell, Coutu, Richard, Evans, Burlingame and Newbrook were present.  The fire service was represented by Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal Alan Adams of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal’s Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Newbrook and seconded by Commissioner Evans to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.

FINDINGS OF FACT
	
The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of a March 28, 2000 inspection report complied by the Portsmouth Fire Marshal’s Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Portsmouth Fire Marshal’s Office during the  hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the March 28, 2000 report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Board’s findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein. 
	
Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term “approved”, as used herein, is defined in section 23-28.1-4(3) of the Rhode Island General Laws.

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS

1. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant will correct deficiency 1, by repairing the cited exit signs, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's office.

2. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant will correct deficiency 2, by repairing the cited emergency lighting, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's office.

3. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant will correct deficiency 3, by repairing the cited emergency lighting heads, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's office.

4. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant will correct deficiency 4, by repairing the cited door hardware, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's office.

5. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant will correct deficiency 5, by providing approved flame resistant certification of the cited older backdrop stage curtains.

6. The Board hereby grants a variance from the provisions of section 23-28.12-30(a) in order to allow the Applicant to maintain the existing swing of the door servicing room number 28.  In granting this variance, the Board notes that room 28 was originally slated to be a library.  However, the Applicant has had to utilize this space as an additional classroom.  Finally, it is the understanding of the Board that the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's office has no objection.

7. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiency 7 by removing the cited combustible material at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal.

8. Is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiency 8 by removing the cited extension cord in the resource room. 

9. It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant show correct deficiency 9 by removing the cited hold open devices from the doors leading into the main lobby from the auditorium and the central corridor.

10. Is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant show correct deficiency 10 by providing the cited doors with approved self-closing devices, installed at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshal.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS
	
This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicant’s timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board. (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
	
Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein. (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification. (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).  

Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Board’s Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy. (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
	
The Applicant may appeal the Board’s Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].