The above-captioned case was scheduled for hearing on February 7, 2006 at 1:00 P.M.  At that time, Acting Chairman Coutu and Commissioners Blackburn, Preiss, Burlingame, Pearson, Filippi, OConnell and Newbrook were present.  The fire service was represented by Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal E. Craig Beausoleil of the North Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Newbrook and seconded by Commissioner OConnell to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.
FINDINGS OF FACT
	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of a December 20, 2004 inspection report compiled by the North Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the North Smithfield Fire Marshals Office during the February 7, 2006 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the December 20, 2004 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein. 
	Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS
	1.  During the February 7, 2006 hearing on this matter the Board was advised that the Applicant wished to provide apartments on the third floor of this facility.  The North Smithfield Fire Marshals office requested that, if permission was so granted, the fire alarm system be extended throughout this facility and be provided with municipal connection.  Accordingly, the Board hereby modifies its original decision in file number 980083 in order to allow the occupancy of the third floor of this facility conditioned upon the Applicants compliance with the fifteen (15) point plan governing existing apartment occupancies and the Applicants upgrading of the fire alarm system throughout this facility to a municipal system.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a period of 120 days from the date of this decision in order to make the above corrections, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the North Smithfield Fire Marshals office.  The Board notes that the fourth floor of this facility shall not be occupied for any reason. 
	2-5.  It is the understanding of the Board that the Applicant has corrected deficiencies 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the satisfaction of the North Smithfield Fire Marshals office.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board. (See:  Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).  Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of 
the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].