The above-captioned case was scheduled for hearing on May 2, 2006 at 1:00 P.M.  At that time, Chairman Farrell, Vice Chairman Coutu and Commissioners Preiss, Newbrook, OConnell, Burlingame, Pearson, Blackburn and Filippi were present.  The fire service was represented by Chief of Inspections William Howe of the State Fire Marshals Office and ADSFM Jonathan Smith of the Narragansett Fire Marshal's Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Burlingame and seconded by Vice Chairman Coutu to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.
FINDINGS OF FACT
	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of a January 13, 2005 inspection report compiled by the State Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the State and Narragansett Fire Marshals Offices during the May 2, 2006 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the January 13, 2005 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein. 
	Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the State Fire Marshal or his or her designee.

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS 
	1.  During the May 2, 2006 hearing on this matter, the Narragansett Fire Marshal's office advised the Board that the subject facility would not be considered an important building.  The Board was further advised that the diesel oil tank is located approximately one hundred fifty (150) feet away from the nearest neighbors.  The Board was further advised that the neighbors residence, which is considered to be an important building is located in excess of the forty-foot range outlined in section 13.2.3.6.  Accordingly, the Board hereby grants a variance from the provisions of sections 30.1, 30A, 13.2.3 and 13.2.3.6 in order to allow the Applicant to maintain the cited 330 gallon oil diesel tank within the building in which it is currently located.
	2.  The Board hereby directs the Applicant to correct deficiency 2 by properly identifying the tank as to its hazardous contents.
	3.  The Board hereby directs the Applicant to correct deficiency 3 by providing No Smoking signage at the garage containing this tank.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS
	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).  
Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].