The above-captioned case was scheduled for hearing on March 28, 2006 at 1:00 P.M.  At that time, Chairman Farrell, Vice Chairman Coutu and Commissioners Blackburn, Newbrook, Preiss and Burlingame were present.  The fire service was represented by Deputy State Fire Marshal Cynthia Dehler and Chief Deputy Michael DiMascolo of the State Fire Marshals Office.  A motion was made by Commissioner Newbrook and seconded by Commissioner Blackburn to grant the Applicant relief as outlined herein.  The motion was unanimous.

FINDINGS OF FACT
	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of a May 11, 2005 inspection report compiled by the State Fire Marshals Office along with a March 28, 2006 proposed plan of action for this facility, developed on behalf of the Applicant by the Robinson Green Beretta Corporation.  The above report and proposed plan of action were utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the State Fire Marshals Office during the March 28, 2006 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the May 11, 2005 inspection report and the March 28, 2006 proposed plan of action report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein. 
	Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the State Fire Marshal or his or her designee.

CONCLUSIONS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS 
	1.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance in order to correct deficiency 1 on or before September 1, 2006, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office.
	2.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance until October 2, 2006 in order to correct deficiency 2 in accordance with the March 28, 2006 plan of action, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office.
	3.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance in order to correct deficiency 3, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office, on or before September 1, 2006.
	4-5.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance in order to correct deficiencies 4 and 5 in accordance with the March 28, 2006 plan of action, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office on or before October 2, 2006.
	6.  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance in order to allow the Applicant to correct deficiency 6, in accordance with the March 28, 2006 plan of action, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office, on or before October 2, 2006.
	7-7(i).  The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance in order to correct deficiencies 7, 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g, 7h and 7i in accordance with the March 28, 2006 plan of action, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office, on or before October 2, 2006.  The Board further notes, with regard to deficiency 7i, that these small closets and storage areas within this facility shall also be sprinklered, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's office.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS
	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-17).
	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-18.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification. . (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-19).  
Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy. . (See: Board Rules and Regulations, section 6-2-20).
	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth division of the District Court.  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].