As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on September 20, 2016 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, pursuant to RI General Laws Section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook and Commissioners Richard, Pearson, Sylvester, Booth, Thornton and Davison.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy  State Fire Marshal Eric Cote of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Michael Manzi.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under R.I.G.L. Chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Michael Manzi (owner) of 594 Providence Pike, North Smithfield, RI dated July 13, 2016.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  160110 opened on July 26, 2016.
4.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on September 20, 2016 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
5.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Thornton and seconded by Commissioner Pearson to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 7 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  160110 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  160110 dated July 13, 2016 and filed on July 26, 2016.
2.	Smithfield Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated May 2, 2016.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the September 20, 2016 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the May 2, 2016 inspection report compiled by the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office during the September 20, 2016 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the May 2, 2016 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 2 1/2-story apartment (4 unit) occupancy consisting of approximately six thousand one hundred seventy-two (6,172) square feet and originally built in 1860.
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction and does not have a compliant fire alarm system and is not provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
4.	There is no objection by the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

1.	The Board grants the Applicant a time variance of six (6) months from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 31.2.2.1.3 by installing 1  solid-core wood doors that are self-closing and self-latching in the egress system of this facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
2.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RILSC sections 31.2.2.2.1, 7.2.1.1.1 and 7.1.5.1 by allowing the second means of egress door on the third floor of  2 Hill Street to remain in use based upon a structural hardship.  In consideration of the relief granted herein, the Board directs the Applicant to install door headroom hazard marking, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshal's Office.
3.	This deficiency has been corrected.
4.	This deficiency has been corrected.
5.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of thirty (30) days from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 31.3.4.5.1 and 9.6.2.10.1.1 and NFPA 72 (2010) section 29.5.1.1 by providing the second floor apartment of  2 Hill Street with approved smoke alarms and carbon monoxide alarms, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
6.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of seven (7) days from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 7.1.10.1 by removing all combustible materials stored in the rear egress stairwell of this facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
7.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of six (6) months from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 31.3.4.5.1 and 9.6.2.10.1.1 and NFPA 72 (2010) section 29.5.1.1 by providing approved smoke alarms throughout the facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
8.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of six (6) months from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 31.3.4.3.1, 9.6.3.5 and NFPA 72 (2010 edition) section 29.3.8 by providing approved fire alarm system notification appliances throughout the facility, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
9.	This deficiency has been corrected. 

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

Finally, the Board hereby authorizes the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office to extend the above timeline(s) for good faith compliance efforts being demonstrated by the Applicant in accordance with the provisions of Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-22.1.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-22).
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-23.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-24).
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See:  Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-25).
4.	The Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-18).  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].