As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on December 6, 2016 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, pursuant to RI General Laws Section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook, Vice-Chairman Blackburn and Commissioners Richard, Filippi, Jackson and Booth.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal David Arnold of the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Carol ODonnell.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under R.I.G.L. Chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Bonnet Shores Beach Club Association (authorized representative) of PO Box 238, Saunderstown, RI dated October 29, 2016.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  160138 opened on November 3, 2016.
4.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on December 6, 2016 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
5.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Jackson and seconded by Commissioner Richard to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  160138 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  160138 dated October 29, 2016 and filed on November 3, 2016.
2.	Narragansett Fire Marshals Office Inspection letter dated July 27, 2016.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the December 6, 2016 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the July 27, 2016 inspection letter compiled by the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office during the December 6, 2016 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the July 27, 2016 inspection letter as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 1-story seasonal beach club consisting of a common kitchen facility, dining area and privately owned beach cabanas.
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction and has a compliant fire alarm system with emergency forces notification and is provided with an approved automatic (wet) sprinkler system in the restaurant/kitchen portion of the facility.
4.	The building sprinkler system is provided with an external fire department connection (FDC) allowing the local fire department to supply the sprinkler system independent of the permanent water supply.
5.	There is no objection by the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

1.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RIFC section 10.13.2 by allowing the automatic sprinkler system for the facility to be disabled and drained during the facility off-season from November 1 through May 1, on an annual basis.
2.	In consideration of the relief granted herein, the Board directs the Applicant to provide an inspection report verifying a system flow test and the status of the sprinkler system at the commencement of each operating season to the Narragansett Fire Marshal's Office.  Additionally, the Board directs that there shall be no occupancy of the subject facility for any purpose during the period where the sprinkler system is inoperative.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in R.I.G.L. section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board. Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-22).
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-23.)  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the Fire Code or a revision of the above-cited classification.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-24).
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in R.I.G.L. 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  (See:  Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-25).
4.	In accordance with R.I.G.L 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  (See: Fire Safety Code, section 6-2-18).  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [R.I.G.L. 42-35-15(c)].