Fire Safety Code, Rhode Island

Decisions - Details

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
(401) 889-5551 phone
(401) 889-5279 fax
711 TTY
FIRE SAFETY CODE - BOARD OF APPEAL AND REVIEW
560 Jefferson Boulevard
Suite 202
Warwick, RI 02886
DECISION
FILE NO.: 180056
LOCATION OF PREMISES: 593 Eddy Street (Jane Brown), Providence, RI
APPLICANT: Ricardo Quiterio c/o Rhode Island Hospital 17 Virginia Avenue Providence, RI 02903
USE OR OCCUPANCY: Health Care
DATE OF DECISION: 2018-07-12
As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, June 26, 2018 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook and Commissioners Filippi, Jackson, Sylvester and Davison.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Deputy State Fire Marshal David Pastore of the State Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Scott Patefield.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Ricardo Quiterio (authorized representative) of Rhode Island Hospital, 17 Virginia Avenue, Providence, RI dated April 13, 2018.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  180056 was opened on May 3, 2018.
4.	The matter was initially before the Board on June 5, 2018 at which time it was continued without a finding for further consideration until June 26, 2018.
5.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on June 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
6.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Sylvester and seconded by Commissioner Davison to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 5 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  180056 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  180056 dated April 13, 2018 and filed on May 3, 2018.
a.	Attached Plan of Action dated April 27, 2018.
b.	Letter of authorization for Ricardo Quiterio from Nicholas P. Dominick, Jr. dated February 22, 2018.
2.	State Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated March 5, 2018.
3.	Reschedule Notice dated June 5, 2018.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the June 26, 2018 hearing as exhibits:

1.	Applicants letter of authorization for Scott Patefield from Nicholas P. Dominick, Jr. dated June 19, 2018.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the March 5, 2018 inspection report compiled by the State Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the State Fire Marshals Office during the June 26, 2018 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the March 5, 2018 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 6-story with basement health care occupancy consisting of approximately one hundred fifty-four thousand two hundred three (154,203) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1921, with a 1970 addition.
3.	The building is of Type II (222) construction, has an approved fire alarm system with emergency forces notification and is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
4.	There is no objection by the State Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

1.	This deficiency has been corrected.
2.	This deficiency has been corrected.
3.	This deficiency has been corrected.
4.	This deficiency has been corrected.
5.	This deficiency has been corrected.
6.	This deficiency has been corrected.
7.	EGRESS: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of one hundred eighty (180) days to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 19.2.1 and 19.7.3.2 by modifying or replacing the locking mechanisms for the Behavioral Health Units egress doors.  In granting this relief, the Board finds that 100 retraining of the staff has been completed and directs that monthly retraining to all staff be continued until such time that compliant locking arrangements have been approved by the State Fire Marshal's Office.
8.	EGRESS: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RILSC section 19.2.5.2 by allowing the existing dead-end corridors on floors 2 through 5 to remain in use without modifications based upon a structural hardship.
9.	This deficiency has been corrected.
10.	This deficiency has been corrected.
11.	This deficiency has been corrected.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

Finally, the Board hereby authorizes the State Fire Marshals Office to extend the above timeline(s) for good faith compliance efforts being demonstrated by the Applicant in accordance with the provisions of Blanket Variance  15-01A.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].
rhode island coat of arms A Rhode Island Government Web site