As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, October 2, 2018 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook, Vice-Chairman Blackburn and Commissioners Jackson, Sylvester, Booth and Thornton.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal Michael Dexter of the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Judith Paolucci and Angelo Mencucci.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Judith Paolucci (authorized representative) of Smithfield School Department, 49 Farnum Pike, Smithfield, RI dated July 16, 2018.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  180102 was opened on August 17, 2018.
4.	This property was previously before the Board on November 9, 2004 at which time Decision  040332 was issued dated February 11, 2005.
5.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on October 2, 2018 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
6.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Thornton and seconded by Commissioner Sylvester to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  180102 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  180102 dated July 16, 2018 and filed on August 17, 2018.
a.	Letter of authorization for Judith Paolucci dated July 30, 2018 
2.	Smithfield Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated April 9, 2018.
3.	Decision  040332 dated February 11, 2005.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the October 2, 2018 hearing as exhibits:

1.	Plan of Action dated October 2, 2018

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the April 9, 2018 inspection report compiled by the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office during the October 2, 2018 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the April 9, 2018 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 2-story multiple/mixed use (assembly and educational) occupancy consisting of approximately thirty-two thousand one hundred eight (32,108) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1930.
3.	The building is of Type III (211) construction, has a compliant fire alarm system and is not provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
4.	The Board finds that the Town of Smithfield voters will be considering a school construction bond referendum on November 6, 2018 which if passed, this school will be vacated within the next three (3) years.
5.	There is no objection by the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2012 edition) as reserved and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2012 edition) as reserved and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	This deficiency has been corrected.
2.	This deficiency has been corrected.
3.	This deficiency has been corrected.
4.	EXTINGUISHMENT: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance until the commencement of the 2021/2022 school year from compliance with RILSC section 15.3.5.1 as it relates to automatic sprinkler protection for the basement level of this facility, after which time the facility shall be vacated.  In the event that the November 6, 2018 school construction bond does not pass, the Board directs the Applicant to comply with the provisions of RILSC section 15.3.5.1 by providing the basement level of this facility with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with section 9.7 prior to the commencement of the 2018/2019 school year, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Smithfield Fire Marshal's Office.
5.	This deficiency has been corrected.
6.	This deficiency has been corrected.
7.	This deficiency has been corrected.
8.	This deficiency has been corrected.
9.	This deficiency has been corrected.
10.	This deficiency has been corrected.
11.	This deficiency has been corrected.
12.	This deficiency has been corrected.
13.	This deficiency has been corrected.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

Finally, the Board hereby authorizes the Smithfield Fire Marshals Office to extend the above timeline(s) for good faith compliance efforts being demonstrated by the Applicant in accordance with the provisions of Blanket Variance  15-01A.

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].