As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, November 27, 2018 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook and Commissioners Filippi, Pearson, Jackson, Booth and Thornton.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals John Horan and Mark Rizzo of the North Providence Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Kevin Toomey, Glenn Gollenberg, Chad Healey and Jillian Proulx.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Jim Fuoroli (authorized representative) of Town of North Providence, 2240 Mineral Spring Avenue, North Providence, RI dated October 24, 2018.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  180128 was opened on October 26, 2018.
4.	The matter was initially scheduled before the Board on October 30, 2018 and which time it was continued until November 27, 2018.
5.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on November 27, 2018 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
6.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Booth and seconded by Commissioners Filippi and Jackson to deny the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 5 to 1 vote with Commissioner Thornton voting in opposition.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  180128 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  180128 dated October 24, 2018 and filed on October 26, 2018.
a.	Letter of authorization for Chad Healey and Kevin Toomey from Jim Fuoroli dated October 24, 2018 
2.	North Providence Fire Marshals Office Plan Review Report dated October 24, 2018.
3.	Reschedule Notice dated November 1, 2018.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the November 27, 2018 hearing as exhibits:

1.	Applicants Plan of Action dated November 20, 2018 with drawing  A001.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Finding of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the October 24, 2018 plan review report compiled by the North Providence Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the North Providence Fire Marshals Office during the November 27, 2018 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the October 24, 2018 plan review report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is a new 2-story above grade building without a basement level, classified as an educational occupancy, consisting of approximately sixty-two thousand five hundred (62,500) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 2018.
3.	The building is of Type II (111) construction, will have a compliant EVAC fire alarm system with emergency forces notification and will be provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
4.	The Board acknowledges the objection by the North Providence Fire Marshals Office to the granting of any relief.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2012 edition) as reserved and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2012 edition) as reserved and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	The Board hereby denies the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RILSC sections 14.3.1.1 and 8.6.8 based upon the concept of new construction shall be code compliant.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].