As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, September 24, 2019 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook and Commissioners Pearson, Booth, Thornton, ODonnell and Muto.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Deputy State Fire Marshal Eric Kiernan of the State Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Timothy Wensus.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Tim Wensus (authorized representative) of Jensen Hughes, 117 Metro Center Boulevard -- Suite 1002, Warwick, RI dated July 2, 2019.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  190113 was opened on July 9, 2019.
4.	The matter was initially before the Board on July 23, 2019 at which time it was reassigned until September 24, 2019 for the Applicant to return with a plan of action for the property.
5.	A subsequent hearing on the Application was conducted on September 24, 2019 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
6.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Thornton and seconded by Commissioner Pearson to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  190113 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  190113 dated July 2, 2019 and filed on July 9, 2019.
a.	Attached Plan of Action dated July 2, 2019
b.	Letter of authorization for Jensen Hughes from Jordan M. Stone of Peregrine Group, LLC dated June 25, 2019.
c.	Applicants revised Plan of Action dated September 20, 2019.
2.	State Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated May 14, 2019.
3.	Reschedule Notice dated July 24, 2019.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the September 24, 2019 hearing as exhibits:

1.	Applicants photographs (6).

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the May 14, 2019 inspection report compiled by the State Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the State Fire Marshals Office during the September 24, 2019 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the May 14, 2019 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 2-1/2 story above grade building with a basement level, classified as a hotel occupancy, consisting of approximately three thousand five hundred eighty-nine (3,589) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1907.
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction, has a compliant fire alarm system and is provided with an approved partial automatic sprinkler system.
4.	The Board further incorporates and adopts the Applicants plan of action dated September 20, 2019, as referenced herein.
5.	There is no objection by the State Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	EGRESS: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RILSC sections 29.2.1.2 and 24.2.2.3 by allowing the existing guest room windows on the second and third floors to remain in use without modification based upon a structural hardship and the existence of a previously installed, non-required partial automatic sprinkler system.
a.	In consideration of the relief granted herein, the Board directs that the existing partial automatic sprinkler system be deemed a required system, subject to all associated inspection, testing and maintenance requirements.
b.	Further, the sprinkler system waterflow alarm switch and control valve supervisory switch shall be interfaced with the building fire alarm system prior to reopening for the next tourism season in the spring of 2020.
i.	The Board grants the Applicant relief from RILSC section 9.6.7.3 by allowing the initiating device(s) on the second and third floors to be combined into a single fire alarm zone, thus freeing up a zone for use as a dedicated supervisory zone.  The existing sprinkler system control valve supervisory switch shall be connected to this new zone.
ii.	The existing sprinkler system waterflow alarm switch shall be connected to the existing Basement zone.
iii.	The fire alarm control unit shall be properly identified in accordance with RILSC section 9.6.7.2.1.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].