As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, October 22, 2019 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5.
	In attendance at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook, Vice-Chairman Blackburn and Commissioners Pearson, Booth, Thornton and Muto.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Deputy State Fire Marshal David DiMaio of the State Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Robert Noonan, Daniel Champagne and Jennifer Croce.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Robert Noonan (authorized representative) of 193 Forest Avenue, Middletown, RI dated August 12, 2019.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  190136 was opened on August 27, 2019.
4.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on October 22, 2019 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
5.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Commissioner Pearson and seconded by Commissioner Thornton to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  190136 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  190136 dated August 12, 2019 and filed on August 27, 2019.
a.	Letter of authorization for Robert Noonan from James S. Mamary, Sr. dated August 1, 2019 .
2.	State Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated February 18, 2019.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the October 22, 2019 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the February 18, 2019 inspection report compiled by the State Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the State Fire Marshals Office during the October 22, 2019 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the February 18, 2019 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 2-1/2-story above grade building with a basement level, classified as a multiple/mixed use (Industrial and Lodging & Rooming House) occupancy, consisting of approximately ten thousand six hundred sixty-two (10,662) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1900.
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction, has an approved (with deficiencies) fire alarm system and is provided with an approved (with deficiencies) automatic sprinkler system.
4.	The Board finds that all sleeping accommodations have been removed from the facility and that use of the building is limited to the laundry operation only (industrial use), that the building has been secured from unauthorized entry, and that the occupant load of the building is limited to two (2) employees.
5.	There is no objection by the State Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	This deficiency has been corrected.
2.	This deficiency has been corrected.
3.	The Board directs that all future construction within the building comply with the applicable permitting process in accordance with RIFC section 1.12.8, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshal's Office.
4.	ELECTRICAL: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of sixty (60) days from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RIFC section 11.1.2 by providing certification from a licensed electrician that all electrical installations in this facility are in compliance with applicable codes, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshals Office.
5.	This deficiency has been corrected.
6.	EXTINGUISHMENT: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of sixty (60) days from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 26.3.6.2 and 9.7.1 and NFPA 25 (2014) section 14.2.1 by providing documentation that the automatic sprinkler system of this facility has had the required internal inspection, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the State Fire Marshals Office.
7.	This deficiency has been corrected.
8.	This deficiency has been corrected.
9.	This deficiency has been corrected.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].