As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, July 12, 2022 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] sections 23-28.3-5 and 42-46-3.

	Participating at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Acting Chairman Pearson and Commissioners Booth, Thornton, ODonnell, Muto and Spaziani.
APPLICANT: Edward Rowse.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	These are an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application were filed by Edward Rowse (authorized representative) of 400 Massasoit Avenue  Suite 300, East Providence, RI dated June 2, 2022.
3.	The Application were received by the Board and Files  2022059-63 was opened on June 10, 2022.
4.	All of the above properties were previously before the Board on November 12, 2008 at which time Decisions  060176  060180 were issued dated November 17, 2008.
5.	Additionally, the 243 Smith Street property was previously before the Board on April 3, 2007 at which time Decision  070025 was issued dated August 23, 2007.
6.	A hearing on the Applications was conducted on July 12, 2022 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
7.	After consideration of the application, the testimony of the witnesses and of the entire record presented to the Board, and after carefully reviewing such information, a motion was made by Commissioner Booth and seconded by Commissioners ODonnell and Spaziani to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  2022059-63 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  2022059-63 dated June 2, 2022 and filed on June 10, 2022.
a.	Letter of authorization for Rowse Architects from Jeffrey Bent dated May 25, 2022.
2.	Providence Fire Marshals Office Plan Review Report dated May 12, 2022.
3.	Inspector April Kuzdeba of the Providence Fire Marshals Office email to Janet Lever of Providence Housing Authority indicating no objection to the relief requested dated June 3, 2022.
4.	Inspector April Kuzdeba of the Providence Fire Marshals Office email to the Board indicating no objection to the relief requested dated June 21, 2022.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the July 12, 2022 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact:

1.	The Decision below corresponds with the May 12, 2022 plan review report compiled by the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board and the Applicant during the July 12, 2022 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the May 12, 2022 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	There is no objection by the Providence Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	The Board hereby grants the Applicant a variance from the provisions of RIFC section 11.9.3 by allowing the new emergency command centers to remain in use as designed and constructed without modification based upon a structural hardship.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: RIGL section 23-28.3-6 and FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].