As indicated in the file, a hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted by Zoom webinar on Tuesday, May 12, 2020 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] section 23-28.3-5 and Executive Orders  20-05, 20-25 and 20-34.
.
	Participating at the hearing were the following:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Newbrook, Vice-Chairman Blackburn and Commissioners Pearson, Sylvester, Thornton, Davison, ODonnell and Muto.
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshal Mark Reimels of the Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office.
APPLICANT: Ken Golini.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq.

TRAVEL OF THE CASE

1.	This is an Application for Variance filed under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.	The Application was filed by Ken Golini (authorized representative) of 6 Waterford Circle, Dighton, MA dated February 8, 2020.
3.	The Application was received by the Board and File  2020010 was opened on February 21, 2020.
4.	A hearing on the Application was conducted by Zoom webinar on May 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review.
5.	After all evidence was presented at the hearing, a motion was made by Vice-Chairman Blackburn and seconded by Commissioner Thornton to grant the Applicant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on an 8 to 0 vote.

RECORD OF THE CASE

The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  2020010 and are pertinent to the decision rendered:

1.	Variance Application  2020010 dated February 8, 2020 and filed on February 21, 2020.
a.	Letter of authorization for Ken Golini from David Bazarsky dated February 4, 2020.
2.	Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated January 15, 2020.
3.	Reschedule Notice dated March 13, 2020.
4.	Zoom Reschedule Notice dated May 6, 2020.

EXHIBITS

The following documents were presented at the May 12, 2020 hearing as exhibits:

1.	None.

FINDINGS OF FACT

	Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact:

1.	The numbers of the Decision below correspond with those of the January 15, 2020 inspection report compiled by the Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Applicant and the Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office during the May 12, 2020 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the January 15, 2020 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings, such as correction of a deficiency by the Applicant, shall be noted herein.
2.	The building is an existing 1-story above grade building without a basement level, classified as a multiple/mixed use occupancy, consisting of approximately eight thousand two hundred sixty-one (8,261) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1983.
3.	The building is of masonry construction, has a compliant fire alarm system and is not provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
4.	The subject of this appeal is limited to tenant Unit A, an approximately 1,256 sf mercantile space dba Roccos Little Italy, and reflected in violations  17-100-VN and 17-99-VN.  The remaining violations are the responsibility of the property owner and will be addressed separately in a subsequent inspection report by the Portsmouth Fire Marshal's Office.
5.	There is no objection by the Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS

References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2015 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8.

1.	17-100-VN  This deficiency has been corrected.
2.	17-99-VN  COMMERCIAL COOKING: The Board hereby grants the Applicant a time variance of one (1) year from the date of the decision to comply with the provisions of NFPA 96 (2014) sections 5.1.2 through 5.1.5 by providing this facility with an approved kitchen hood & exhaust system, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Portsmouth Fire Marshals Office.  In consideration of the relief granted herein, the Board directs the Applicant to continue to comply with all required periodic inspection, testing and maintenance requirements.
3.	17-140-VN  This deficiency has been withdrawn for the purposes of this appeal and will be addressed in a subsequent inspection report to be issued to the owner of the property.
4.	17-139-VN  This deficiency has been withdrawn for the purposes of this appeal and will be addressed in a subsequent inspection report to be issued to the owner of the property.
5.	17-136-VN  This deficiency has been withdrawn for the purposes of this appeal and will be addressed in a subsequent inspection report to be issued to the owner of the property.

Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Applicant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals).

STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS

1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Applicants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(V)].
2.	Failure of the Applicant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X)].
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense.
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Applicant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(R)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].