A hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, February 11, 2025 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] sections 23-28.3-5, 42-35-9 and 42-46-3. 
 
In attendance at the hearing were the following: 
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Blackburn, Vice-Chairperson Thornton and Commissioners Muto, Walsh, Horan & Mancini. 
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION [AHJ]: State Fire Marshal Kevin Tuthill of the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office. 
APPELLANT: Sachin Patel, Christen Conley and Peter Casale. 
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq. 
 
TRAVEL OF THE CASE 
 
1.	This is an Application for Appeal submitted under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder. 
2.	The Application was submitted by Sachin Patel (authorized representative) of 85 Ocean Road, Narragansett, RI dated August 25, 2024. 
3.	The Application was processed by the Board and Appeal  2024143 was filed on August 26, 2024. 
4.	The matter was initially before the Board on December 10, 2024 at which time it was continued without a finding to permit the Appellant time to retain a design professional and return with a plan of action. 
5.	A subsequent hearing on the Application was conducted on February 11, 2025 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review. 
6.	After consideration of the application, the testimony of the witnesses and of the entire record presented to the Board, and after carefully reviewing such information, a motion was made by Commissioner Horan and seconded by Commissioner Walsh to grant the Appellant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 6 to 0 vote. 
 
RECORD OF THE CASE 
 
The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  2024143 and are pertinent to the decision rendered: 
 
1.	Appeal Application  FVA-24-143 submitted on August 25, 2024 and filed on August 26, 2024. 
a.	Letter [email] of authorization for Sachinkumar Patel from Piyush Patel dated August 26, 2024. 
2.	Narragansett Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated July 29, 2024. 
3.	Appellants request for continuance dated October 17, 2024. 
4.	Reschedule Notice dated October 21, 2024. 
5.	Email from AHJ with images (20 pages) attached dated November 27, 2024. 
6.	Appellants supplemental plan of action dated December 4, 2024. 
7.	Letter [email] of authorization for Sachin Patel and Christine Conley from Piyush Patel dated December 9, 2024. 
8.	Drawings from AHJ (2 pages) dated December 16, 2024. 
9.	Reschedule Notice dated December 17, 2024. 
10.	Appellants revised drawings (4 pages) dated February 3, 2025. 
 
 
EXHIBITS 
 
The following documents were presented at the February 11, 2025 hearing as exhibits: 
 
1.	None. 
 
FINDINGS OF FACT 
 
Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact: 
 
1.	The numbers of the determinations below correspond with those of the July 29, 2024 inspection report compiled by the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Appellant and the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office during the February 11, 2025 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the July 29, 2024 inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings relating to this report, such as correction of a deficiency by the Appellant, shall be noted herein. 
2.	The building is 3-story above grade building without a basement level, classified as a multiple/mixed use (hotel and apartment) occupancy, consisting of approximately seventeen thousand (17,000) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1870. 
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction, a compliant fire alarm system with emergency forces notification and not provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 
4.	There is no objection by the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief outlined herein. 
 
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND 
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS 
 
References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8. 
 
1.	This deficiency/violation has been corrected. 
2.	This deficiency/violation has been corrected. 
3.	EGRESS: The Board hereby grants the Appellant a time variance to comply with the provisions of RILSC sections 31.2.1.2 and 24.2.2 by implementing the following plan of action: 
a.	Within thirty (30) days of the date of the decision, approved windows for escape shall be installed in Units  301 & 303; 
b.	Within thirty (30) days of the date of the decision, plans shall be submitted for the installation of an approved sprinkler system in accordance with section 9.7 throughout the third floor of the facility.  The Board further grants the Appellant an additional one hundred fifty (150) days in order to implement the above plan of action, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office; and, 
c.	The Board directs that Unit  302 shall remain unoccupied until such time that the sprinkler system has been installed, tested and is operational, at the direction and to the satisfaction of the Narragansett Fire Marshal's Office. 
4.	This deficiency/violation has been corrected. 
5.	This deficiency/violation has been corrected. 
 
Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Appellant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals). 
 
Finally, the Board hereby authorizes the Narragansett Fire Marshals Office, upon receiving a written request, to extend the above timeline(s) for good faith compliance efforts being demonstrated by the Appellant by one (1) or more extensions of time of not more than thirty (30) days each, for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days in accordance with the provisions of 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(X). 
 
STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS 
 
1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Appellants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)]. 
2.	Failure of the Appellant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Z)]. 
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(AA)]. 
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense. 
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Appellant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: RIGL section 23-28.3-6 and FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(S)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].