A hearing involving the above-captioned property was conducted on Tuesday, February 25, 2025 before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review [hereinafter the Board], pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws [RIGL] sections 23-28.3-5, 42-35-9 and 42-46-3. 
 
In attendance at the hearing were the following: 
COMMISSIONERS: Vice-Chairperson Thornton and Commissioners Spaziani, Muto, Walsh, Horan & Mancini. 
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION [AHJ]: State Fire Marshal Scott Mooney, Sr. of the Providence Fire Marshals Office. 
APPELLANT: Francis Paolino. 
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: W. Keith Burlingame, Esq. 
 
TRAVEL OF THE CASE 
 
1.	This is an Application for Appeal submitted under RIGL chapter 23-28.3, entitled Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review, and the Administrative Regulations promulgated thereunder. 
2.	The Application was submitted by Frankie Paolino (owner) of 206 Smith Street, Providence, RI dated January 27, 2025. 
3.	The Application was processed by the Board and Appeal  2025013 was filed on January 31, 2025. 
4.	A hearing on the Application was conducted on February 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM before the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review. 
5.	After consideration of the application, the testimony of the witnesses and of the entire record presented to the Board, and after carefully reviewing such information, a motion was made by Commissioner Horan and seconded by Commissioner Mancini to deny the Appellant the relief as outlined herein.  The motion passed on a 5 to 1 vote with Vice-Chair Thornton voting in opposition. 
 
RECORD OF THE CASE 
 
The following documents are part of the administrative record for Appeal  2025013 and are pertinent to the decision rendered: 
 
1.	Appeal Application  FVA-25-13 submitted on January 27, 2025 and filed on January 31, 2025. 
a.	Attached Plan of Action and supporting documents (15 pages). 
2.	Providence Fire Marshals Office Inspection Report dated [undated]. 
3.	Appellants request for expedited review [email] dated January 30, 2025. 
 
EXHIBITS 
 
The following documents were presented at the February 25, 2025 hearing as exhibits: 
 
1.	None. 
 
FINDINGS OF FACT 
 
Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the hearing and a review of the administrative file, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact: 
 
1.	The determination below corresponds with the [undated] inspection report compiled by the Providence Fire Marshals Office.  The above report was utilized by the Board, the Appellant and the Providence Fire Marshals Office during the February 25, 2025 hearing on this matter.  Accordingly, the Board hereby incorporates the [undated] inspection report as its initial findings of fact.  Any modification of the Boards findings relating to this report, such as correction of a deficiency by the Appellant, shall be noted herein. 
2.	The building is 3-story above grade building with a basement level, classified as a multiple/mixed use (business and residential) occupancy, consisting of approximately four thousand five hundred eighty-six (4,586) square feet (gross area) and originally built in 1900. 
3.	The building is of Type V (000) construction, an approved (with deficiencies) fire alarm system and not provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 
4.	The Board finds through the testimony of the Appellant that this is a change of [zoning] use project, remaining an existing business occupancy on the first floor with a two-level residential dwelling unit occupying the second and third floors. 
5.	The Board finds through the testimony of the AHJ that the City of Providence maintains a public emergency alarm reporting system [NFPA 72 Chapter 27] as provided for in RILSC section 9.6.4.2. 
6.	The Board finds through the testimony of the parties that the Appellant is seeking to provide a remote supervising station alarm system [NFPA Chapter 26.5] as an alternative equivalency. 
7.	The Board finds through the testimony of the parties that the building is provided with two (2) egress stairways, both of which are shared by the business and residential occupancies without separation. 
8.	The Board acknowledges the objection by the Providence Fire Marshals Office to the granting of the relief requested herein. 
 
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND 
DETERMINATIONS ON VARIANCE REQUESTS 
 
References to NFPA shall mean the National Fire Protection Association; references to the Rhode Island Fire Code [RIFC] shall mean NFPA 1, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-7; and, references to the Rhode Island Life Safety Code [RILSC] shall mean NFPA 101, (2018 edition) as incorporated by reference and amended by 450-RICR-00-00-8. 
 
1.	The Board hereby DENIES the Appellant a variance from the provisions of RILSC section 39.3.4.4 and requesting the use of a remote supervising station alarm system where emergency forces notification is required. 
 
Any deficiency understood by the Board to have been corrected, which is not so corrected, shall be immediately corrected by the Appellant.  The term approved, as used herein, is understood to mean in accordance with the specific provisions related to the particular subject as are contained in this Code, or as approved in particular by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (State Fire Marshal, his or her designated Deputy State Fire Marshals and/or Assistant Deputy State Fire Marshals). 
 
STATUS OF DECISION AND APPEAL RIGHTS 
 
1.	This Decision constitutes a final order of the Fire Safety Code Board of Appeal and Review as set forth in RIGL section 42-35-12 and represents a comprehensive, integrated plan of fire safety for the above-captioned facility under the above-cited use or occupancy.  Accordingly, every variance granted is conditioned upon the Appellants timely and continued compliance with all of the directives of the Board.  Every variance granted is further conditioned upon the continued use or occupancy of this facility under the above-cited classification reviewed by the Board.  [See: Fire Safety Code [FSC] section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(W)]. 
2.	Failure of the Appellant to initially comply with the full Decision of the Board, within the stated time frame, shall void all variances granted herein.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Y)].  In the event of complete, timely and continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall be deemed to have vested in the above-captioned facility.  As long as this facility is in continued compliance with the full Decision of the Board, the above-cited variances shall remain with this facility in the absence of any change in use or occupancy mandating review under a separate classification of the FSC or a revision of the above-cited classification.  [See: FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(Z)]. 
3.	Such changes in use or occupancy of this facility, or failure to continually comply with the Boards Decision shall void all variances granted under the above-cited use or occupancy.  If such change creates a new use or occupancy as outlined in RIGL section 23-28.1-6, all variances granted under the original use or occupancy are void and this facility shall be reviewed under the newly created use or occupancy.  [See:  FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(AA)]. 
4.	In accordance with RIGL section 23-28.3-5(e), any person who violates a final order of the Board may be subject to prosecution in the District Court with possible imprisonment for a term not exceeding one (1) year, or fined not more than one thousand dollars (1000) for each offense. 
5.	In accordance with RIGL section 42-35-12, the Appellant may appeal the Boards Decision, within thirty (30) days of the mailing date of this Decision, by commencing an action against the State Fire Marshal in the Sixth Division of the District Court.  [See: RIGL section 23-28.3-6 and FSC section 450-RICR-00-00-1.7.2(S)].  Commencement of such an action does not operate as an automatic stay of this Decision [See: RIGL section 42-35-15(c)].