The Complainant alleged that the Town violated the APRA when it twice produced the same document with slightly different spacing. We found that the Town timely responded to both of the Complainant's APRA requests by providing the requested document. The slightly different spacing was due to differences in the forwarding address but did not alter the document's content. We also found that the Complainant's APRA requests failed to specify which format he was requesting. For these reasons, we found no violation.