The Complainant alleged that the City violated the OMA when it formed a stakeholder group that met or will meet outside the public purview. The uncontroverted evidence demonstrated that no meeting of the stakeholders group had occurred. Therefore, the OMA was not implicated. Furthermore, based on the undisputed evidence, the stakeholders group acknowledged that it is subject to the OMA and had taken steps to comply with the OMA's requirements. For these reasons, we found no violation.